Quoting Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia :

Transhumanism (abbreviated as H+ or h+) is an international cultural and intellectual movement with an eventual goal of fundamentally transforming the human condition by developing and making widely available technologies to greatly enhance human intellectual, physical, and psychological capacities.

I've been considering myself a transhumanist for several years now, working towards the transhumanist values in most activities I consciously undertook. While the initial fascination came to me from some excellent hard science-fiction novels, I learned the philosophy from Eliezer Yudkowsky's Simplified Humanism notion and LessWrong community. Very early in my activism I learned to see a strong distinction between the fiction and philopsophy, hoping instead of believing and taking action today.

I've had a pleasure of working with some excellent people in the field, inter alia Anton Kulaga, founder of Ukrainian transhumanist movement, and with his help - doctor Aubrey de Grey, the founder of SENS and a well-known biogerontology pioneer and promoter. I've seen a dozens of educational actions showing regular people the importance of longevity research, took part in …

Continue reading

At the very end of the previous year I was invited by a Museum of Modern Art in Warsaw to conduct a CryptoParty at the finissage of "Privacy settings" exhibition. I'm very glad that the organizers thought about educating their guests and showing them a real face of the Internet, not only phrased as a contemporary work of art.

Since CryptoParty may mean many things - and I've attended a workshop about it during the 31C3 - it was important to have a clear vision in mind. As the form of workshop was unfavorable in the Museum's conditions: more than 40 predicted guests with almost no prior knowledge and only 90 minutes for the event - I decided to go with a lecture in four parts. I tried to design it this way so every section would build on the previous, and each was more optional for a normal user.

The first one - an introduction - answered a question: why. What is the threat? For whom? Why is it so? Naming cyber-criminals, corporations and government agencies, telling a little …

Continue reading

I'm writing this article on a train, coming back from the very latest Offtopicarium, a Polish conference organized by scientists about sciences, but not exactly scientific. Held in both Polish and English (participants choose language they prefer), it's quite an intimate event, gathering no more than 25 people, 90% of whom with an active academic background.

The aim of Offtopicarium is to deal with all topics considered too 'loose' or 'in between' to be presented at a regular scientific conference. It covers various people's approaches and de-facto IS about various approaches to science. Some of the presentations contain large amounts of data - something major, on-topic conferences made us accustomed to - while others barely sketch the main idea and hope for a fruitful discussion, where any kind of hard data wouldn't be suitable.

A good example of the latter kind is a presentation about Science Communication (also Promotion and Education) by Michal Krupinski, as it painted all the contrasts between the Warsaw and Cracow approach to promoting scientific discoveries and knowledge.

On the other hand, Błażej …

Continue reading

I would like to correct the information: I never claimed to be a graduate of Neuroinformatics from the University of Warsaw.

W 37 numerze czasopisma Bloomberg Businessweek Polska, w artykule "Halo, halo, pobudka!" zamieszczony został między innymi wywiad ze mną. O ile jest to (całkowicie zrozumiale) wycinek z mojej ponad godzinnej rozmowy z dziennikarzem Bloomberga, chciałbym zaznaczyć, że w żadnym momencie nie twierdziłem, że jestem absolwentem Neuroinformatyki na Uniwersytecie Warszawskim. Informacja ta nie została przeze mnie autoryzowana.

Wszystkich przepraszam za nieporozumienie.

Cały artykuł dostępny jest niestety jedynie w wersji papierowej lub za paywallem. Poza wyżej wymienionym błędem wydaje się on dość rzetelny i wyważony, nie faworyzując żadnej ze stron - zwolenników ani przeciwników NeuroOna. Słusznie twierdzi on na zakończenie, że o sukcesie bądź porażce NeuroOna mówić można dopiero po rozesłaniu zamówionych masek i podliczeniu wydatków.

We used to read about technologies radically changing our bodies and minds in science fiction. With time, such ideas started appearing in scientific journals, often bizarrely misinterpreted by journalists, claiming impending telekinesis or telepathy for everybody. They stayed out of scopes of normal people's lives, with a status of almost a legend, not closer than Moon landing or Mars exploration.

Very few people are aware that technologies such as cyborgization (and I'm not afraid to use that word) are available now and are a way of treating very real patients in the hospitals. These aren't shiny, chromed implants* allowing to throw cars around and jump over buildings - these are medical devices used to treat conditions we weren't able to cure before. And they come with all the drawbacks of regular health insurance: you have to wait two months to have a knee surgery? Well, a cyborg has to wait over a year to get new batteries.

Even with such an introduction, this is not an essay unrelated to reality.

Several months ago I met a …

Continue reading